Documents: Allow for video and audio files #2030

New issue

Open

opened 2014-01-16 02:05:52 +00:00 by rlx · 3 comments

rlx commented

2014-01-16 02:05:52 +00:00

Owner

(not every archive can delegate secondary videos to Pad.ma)

j added the

general

label 2014-01-16 02:05:52 +00:00

0x2620 was assigned by j

2014-01-16 02:05:52 +00:00

j added the

normal

enhancement

labels 2014-01-16 02:05:52 +00:00

j commented

2014-01-16 05:22:28 +00:00

Owner

but something like this for transcodes:

/documents/id/480p.webm
/documents/id/480p.mp4

and name + extension for uploaded file:

/documents/id/name.extension

should work, only limitation is that name can not be \d+p (240p, 480p) now...

this would require transcoding to supported codecs to support playback on supported browsers. also means we have to add new urls for transcoded documents. Do we need the same set of resolutions we have for items? Would be the most consistent. but something like this for transcodes: ``` /documents/id/480p.webm /documents/id/480p.mp4 ``` and name + extension for uploaded file: ``` /documents/id/name.extension ``` should work, only limitation is that name can not be \d+p (240p, 480p) now...

rlx commented

2014-01-17 14:32:34 +00:00

Author

Owner

Support for WEBM (simple video player) should be comparatively easy.

Backend tasks would be poster extraction and MP4 transcode.

Support for WEBM (simple video player) should be comparatively easy. Backend tasks would be poster extraction and MP4 transcode.

j commented

2014-01-17 14:36:14 +00:00

Owner

duration might be also needed